Vice President Yemi Osinbajo has written Google to remove a video considered to be malicious from YouTube.
A video report published on September 20 on the video-sharing site, Google, by Roots TV Nigeria alleged that Vice President Osinbajo “used” federal agencies under his supervision as vice president “to stack funds” for 2023 general elections.
His legal representative, Femi Atoyebi law firm said in the letter to Google that the report was untrue and defamatory.
Vice President Osinbajo says he’s ready to waive his constitutional immunity to “enable the most robust adjudication” of several allegations against his person and office.
He has also started legal action against two persons his office accuses of making the claims he calls baseless.
Vanguard newspaper on Wednesday apologised to Mr Osinbajo over a news report alleging that he mismanaged N90 billion said to have been released by the Federal Inland Revenue Service to the All Progressives Congress for the 2019 general elections.
The newspaper in a statement posted on its website apologised to the vice president, the APC, and the FIRS for “any inconvenience or embarrassment the publication has occasioned them”.
Meanwhile, a Lagos-based lawyer, Inibehe Effiong, says Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo lacks the constitutional power to waive his immunity.
READ ALSO: OSINBAJO WAIVES OWN IMMUNITY TO SUE TIMI FRANK
Effiong said this in a statement while reacting to Osinbajo’s vow to waive his constitutional immunity to pave the way for the “most robust adjudication” over an allegation that he took N90bn from the Federal Inland Revenue Service to fund the 2019 general elections.
The lawyer said the Supreme Court had ruled in the matter of Bola Tinubu vs I.M.B Securities Plc that a person holding any of the executive offices that has immunity cannot waive it.
He said, “Based on the extant constitutional regime, the Vice-President Prof. Yemi Osinbajo, cannot waive his immunity. The Supreme Court decided in 2001 in the case of Tinubu v. I. M. B. Securities Plc that the constitutional immunity under Section 308 of the constitution cannot be waived by the persons to whom the provision is meant to protect.
“In the said Tinubu’s case, former Governor Bola Tinubu decided to waive his immunity to defend a civil claim initiated against him. The Supreme Court barred the then governor of Lagos State from proceeding with the suit.”
The lawyer noted that immunity does not cover one from investigation, adding that there was no need for one to waive immunity in order to be probed by a law enforcement agency.
Effiong noted, “I wish to state that the immunity under Section 308 of the Constitution does not extend to criminal investigation by law enforcement agencies. This was the position taken by the Supreme Court in 2002 in the celebrated case of Chief Gani Fawehinmi v. Inspector General of Police.
“Provided the investigation does not result in the arrest or detention of the Vice President or compelling his appearance, he can be investigated.”
Effiong, however, said although Osinbajo could not be sued, he had the power to sue for defamation.
He said the law empowers anyone holding such an office to be able to sue to a certain extent.
The lawyer stated, “However, it should be noted that notwithstanding the immunity clause, the Vice President has the right to sue for defamation of character. While legal proceedings cannot be initiated against him, the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal have decided in several cases that the immunity clause does not prevent the beneficiaries from suing for defamation of character.
“In other words, Prof. Osinbajo can sue but cannot be sued. This was the position taken by the Supreme Court in 2007 in the case of Global Excellence Communications Ltd. V. Donald Duke.”
